This article was co-published with The New York Times.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom based in New York. Sign up for ProPublicasBig Storynewsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

The hot policy in Democratic circles these days is raising taxes on the rich.Sen. Elizabeth Warrenhas a plan to tax ultramillionaires, as she calls them.Sen. Bernie Sanderswants to expand the estate tax.Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezhas floated raising the top income tax rate to 70% for those making over $10 million a year.

But before this country raises taxes, it should grapple with something much more prosaic but equally important for tackling inequality: saving the Internal Revenue Service.

Already, wealthy people and corporations easily get around todays rules. However tough any new laws might seem, theyd soon be undercut.

Slowly and quietly over the past eight years, the IRShas been eviscerated. Its lost tens of thousands of employees. It has fewer auditors now than at any time since 1953. In real dollars, the agencys budget has dropped by almost $3 billion since 2010.

Businesses and the wealthy benefit the most from this state of affairs. The largest corporations in America used to be audited every year. That started to change when the cuts began, and today, the audit rate has fallen by half. Its a similar story for individuals making $10 million or more a year: With twice the chance of escaping IRS scrutiny, the ultrarich are much less likely to lose at the game of audit roulette.

Fixing the problem will require more than increasing the IRS budget (though that would certainly help). Its about having the right personnel with the right skills. Today, the wealthy and corporations have the IRS outgunned. The ultra-affluent with the help of legions of tax professionals make domestic income disappear overseas or hide it in a pyramid of partnerships. Its like trying to take on a modern army while armed with spears and clubs.

The IRS has difficulty tracing the income of the superwealthy or countering their sophisticated arguments about why what appears to be one type of income is actually something else. The agency has also trouble valuing their assets (a problem that,as The New York Times revealed, dates back at least to when Fred Trump was misleading the IRS about how much his buildings were worth). By the public admission of numerous IRS officials,it has long done a poor jobof scrutinizing complicated partnerships to understand who owns what portion of what stock.

How Are Things at the IRS? Help Us Get the Real Story.

ProPublica would like to hear from people who have worked at the Internal Revenue Service or are otherwise knowledgeable about tax enforcement.

The top 0.5% of highest-earning Americans account for about a fifth of the income thats hidden from the IRS,according to one University of Michigan study, or more than $50 billion a year in todays dollars.

Its much easier to enforce the tax laws for the bottom 90% of earners. Wages are reported straight to the IRS, and computers can easily check that tax returns accurately report that income. This means that inadequate enforcement of the tax laws necessarily has a regressive effect, liberating those at the top from scrutiny while the masses continue to be tracked by machines.

With its budget slashed, the IRS has pulled back across the board except for one area where its been easier to keep the numbers from falling so much:audits of the poor. More than one-third of all audit targets are recipients of the earned income tax credit, one of the nations largest anti-poverty programs. By the hundreds of thousands, IRS computers spit out letters that require low-income taxpayers to prove their eligibility. Thecounties with the highest audit ratesarent found in the hedge fund precincts of Connecticut or the lobbyist enclaves of Northern Virginia. No, theyre rural, mostly African American counties in the Deep South.

Theres nothing easy about auditing the rich. Even when the IRS has evidence of flat-out cheating, such as when it discovers a hidden Swiss bank account, it can take years of work to prove its case. Taking such time clashes with one of the core ways the IRS evaluates its managers and agents: how efficiently they open and close audits. As one senior managerput it to us, If youre not churning out the exams, you have to explain why youre not.

But more often, the affairs of the superwealthy are infernally complicated and the IRS doesnt have black-and-white proof of evasion. Instead, the agency runs up against whats called aggressive planning in the tax world. To the rich, a tax return is just an opening offer to the government. If they dont get audited, thats great. If they do, well, theyre ready for a fight.

An eight-year campaign to slash the agencys budget has left it understaffed, hamstrung and operating with archaic equipment. The result: billions less to fund the government. Thats good news for corporations and the wealthy.

In 2009, the IRS decided to take a bold, new approachto auditing the superwealthy. The agencys idea was to bring specialists together and form a kind of green-eyeshade-wearing Delta Force. It would finally do something it surprisingly hadnt been doing before: look at the entirety of a taxpayers empire. That meant examining how his partnerships, limited liability companies, foundations, gifts and overseas operations interact with one another. The ultrarich weave all these together so they end up with an ultralow effective tax rate. We hadnt really been looking at it all together, and shame on us, Steven Miller, a former acting commissioner of the IRS, told us.

Because of budget cuts and lobbying, this elite force never came together. The agency hoped to have a staff of about 240 expert auditors by 2012. But by 2014 it had 96, and by last year the number had fallen to 58. Initially spooked by the groups ambition, tax professionals who counsel the wealthy now speak of the effort with a kind of pity.

Criminal tax enforcement has also faltered. More than 150 million income tax returns were filed in 2017, butthe IRS brought fewer than 800 casesin which someone was charged with making legal income but criminally evading taxes. Thats one reason tax cheats can get away with brazen behavior for so long until they attract the attention of federal investigators for other reasons. Thats what happened to the former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and the former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to tax evasion, and the celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti, who was charged with failing to file taxes at all for several years. (Avenatti denies the charges.)

So, what to do? One 2020 candidate already has a bold proposal to resuscitate the IRS. Its a plan to pump tens of billions into the agency, enough to fund a second army of agents. That candidates name is Donald Trump.

Of course, it was Trumps party that gutted the agency, costing the country,we estimate, more than $100 billion in lost revenue.The presidents 2020 budget, however, did propose adding $15 billion over 10 years to the IRS enforcement budget, a move that would add more than the agencys current budget. The administration estimated this would produce revenue of at least $47 billion. The question arises: Has the administration genuinely had a change of heart? Or is this merely a neat trick to make deficit projections appear smaller?

So far, this is all just talk. It is, though, one of the few areas where Trump and Democrats are in substantive agreement. Democrats in the House recently proposed a $400 million IRS budget increase next year.

Among the Democratic presidential candidates, Warren does mention the IRS in her wealth tax proposal.She calls for an unspecifiedbut significant increase in the IRS enforcement budget and a minimum audit rate for taxpayers subject to her ultramillionaire tax.

Raising taxes on the rich is a more compelling cause than increasing the operating budget of a bureaucracy most American voters probably hate thinking about. But the boldest tax plan of all starts with salvaging the IRS.

Correction, May 5, 2019:This story originally misstated the impact of the presidents 2020 budget proposal to add $15 billion over 10 years to the IRS enforcement budget. It would add more than the agencys current budget, not more than double the agencys overall budget.

Jesse Eisinger is a senior reporter and editor at ProPublica.

Get our investigations delivered to your inbox with the Big Story newsletter.

Once Defiant, All Four White Supremacists Charged in Charlottesville Violence Plead Guilty

How Taxpayers Covered a $1,000 Liquor Bill for Trump Staffers (and More) at Trumps Club

What Will Come of the More Than Me Rape Scandal?

Senior IRS Leaders Launch Review of Agencys Partnership With TurboTax and H&R Block

TurboTax and H&R Block Saw Free Tax Filing as a Threat and Gutted It

Once Defiant, All Four White Supremacists Charged in Charlottesville Violence Plead Guilty

Elizabeth Warren and Other Senators Call for Refunds and Investigations of TurboTax and H&R Block

How Taxpayers Covered a $1,000 Liquor Bill for Trump Staffers (and More) at Trumps Club

What Will Come of the More Than Me Rape Scandal?

Senior IRS Leaders Launch Review of Agencys Partnership With TurboTax and H&R Block

What Happened to All the Jobs Trump Promised? An Update

Once Defiant, All Four White Supremacists Charged in Charlottesville Violence Plead Guilty

Senior IRS Leaders Launch Review of Agencys Partnership With TurboTax and H&R Block

Thank you for your interest in republishing this story. You are are free republish it so long as you do the following:

You cant edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, yesterday can be changed to last week, and Portland, Ore. to Portland or here.)

If youre republishing online, you have to link to us and to include all of the links from our story, as well as ourPixelPing tag.

Its okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories.

You cant republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.

You cannot republish our photographs without specific permission (ask our Public Relations DirectorMinhee Choif youd like to).

You have to credit us ideally in the byline. We prefer Author Name, ProPublica.

Copy and paste the following into your page to republish: